Hi, On 2022-08-31 16:05:03 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Even if there's only a visible leak in v15/HEAD, I'm inclined > to back-patch this all the way, because it's certainly buggy > on its own terms. It's just the merest accident that neither > caller is leaking other stuff into TopMemoryContext, because > they both think they are using a short-lived context.
+1 > Thanks for the report! +1 Greetings, Andres Freund
