On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 05:47:11PM -0700, ja...@mercury.com wrote: > From: Jade Lovelace <ja...@mercury.com> > > I have intentionally been careful to not guarantee that the > automatically generated name *is* what's documented, but instead give > the general idea. > > Knowing the format is useful for people writing migrations/ORM tools > which need to name their unique indices and may wish to use the > automatic naming system.
Uh, I always that if people didn't want to specify an index name, that they didn't care. I think there are enough concurrency issues listed below that I don't see the value of documenting this. If they really care, they can look at the source code. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Indecision is a decision. Inaction is an action. Mark Batterson
