On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 05:53:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Ranier Vilela <ranier...@gmail.com> writes: >> Em sex., 9 de set. de 2022 às 13:20, Nathan Bossart < >> nathandboss...@gmail.com> escreveu: >>> I agree with David [0]. But if you can demonstrate a performance gain, >>> perhaps it's worth considering a subset of these changes in hot paths. > >> head: >> Time: 418,210 ms >> Time: 419,588 ms >> Time: 424,713 ms > >> fprintf patch: >> Time: 416,919 ms >> Time: 416,246 ms >> Time: 416,237 ms > > That is most certainly not enough gain to justify a large amount > of code churn. In fact, given that this is probably pretty > platform-dependent and you've checked only one platform, I don't > think I'd call this a sufficient case for even a one-line change.
Agreed. -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
