Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On 09.09.22 22:13, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think serious consideration should be given to back-patching the
>> 0001 part (that is, addition of the macros). Otherwise we'll have
>> to remember not to use these macros in code intended for back-patch,
>> and that'll be mighty annoying once we are used to them.
> Yes, the 0001 patch is kept separate so that we can do that when we feel
> the time is right.
I think the right time is now, or at least as soon as you're
satisfied that the buildfarm is happy.
regards, tom lane
