Op 12-09-2022 om 16:00 schreef Erik Rijkers:
Op 12-09-2022 om 09:58 schreef Daniel Gustafsson:
On 9 Sep 2022, at 11:00, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
On Sep 9, 2022, at 5:53 PM, John Naylor
<john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
[v4-0001-Add-include-exclude-filtering-via-file-in-pg_dump.patch]
I noticed that pg_restore --filter cannot, or at last not always, be
used with the same filter-file that was used to produce a dump with
pg_dump --filter.
Is that as designed? It seems a bit counterintuitive. It'd be nice if
that could be fixed. Admittedly, the 'same' problem in pg_restore -t,
also less than ideal.
(A messy bashdemo below)
I hope the issue is still clear, even though in the bash I sent, I
messed up the dumpfile name (i.e., in the bash that I sent the pg_dump
creates another dump name than what is given to pg_restore. They should
use the same dumpname, obviously)
thanks,
Erik Rijkers
