On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 1:55 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > John Naylor <john.nay...@enterprisedb.com> writes: > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 3:11 PM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ah...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The patch does not apply successfully; please rebase the patch. > > > There's a good reason for that -- the latest one was committed two > > weeks ago. The status should still be waiting on author, though, > > namely for: > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 5:28 AM Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Remaining things from this thread: > >> * removing --disable-thread-safety > >> * removing those vestigial HAVE_XXX macros (one by one analysis and > >> patches) > >> * making Unix sockets secure for Windows in tests > > I imagine we should just close the current CF entry as committed. > There's no patch in existence for any of those TODO items, and > I didn't think one was imminent.
I have patches for these, but not quite ready to post. I'll mark this entry closed, and make a new one or two when ready, instead of this one-gigantic-CF-entry-that-goes-on-forever format.
