I wrote:
> and bisecting fingers this commit as the guilty party:
> commit 91e9e89dccdfdf4216953d3d8f5515dcdef177fb
> Author: David Rowley <drow...@postgresql.org>
> Date: Thu Jul 22 14:03:19 2021 +1200
> Make nodeSort.c use Datum sorts for single column sorts
After looking at that for a little while, I wonder if we shouldn't
fix this by restricting the Datum-sort path to be used only with
pass-by-value data types. That'd require only a minor addition
to the new logic in ExecInitSort.
The alternative of inserting a pfree of the old value would complicate
the code nontrivially, I think, and really it would necessitate a
complete performance re-test. I'm wondering if the claimed speedup
for pass-by-ref types wasn't fictional and based on skipping the
required pfrees. Besides, if you think this code is hot enough that
you don't want to add a test-and-branch per tuple (a claim I also
doubt, BTW) then you probably don't want to add such overhead into
the pass-by-value case where the speedup is clear.
regards, tom lane
