On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 4:51 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thomas, are you planning to continue with this patch? If not, I don't mind > picking it up.
Hi Nathan, Please go ahead! One thing I had in my notes to check with this patch is whether there might be a bug due to computing all times in microseconds, but sleeping for a number of milliseconds without rounding up (what I mean is that if it's trying to sleep for 900 microseconds, it might finish up sleeping for 0 milliseconds in a tight loop a few times).