On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 19:15 Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> On 2022-Oct-07, Amit Langote wrote: > > > > Thanks for the heads up. Hmm, this I am not sure how to reproduce on > > > my own, so I am currently left with second-guessing what may be going > > > wrong on 32 bit machines with whichever of the 4 patches. > > > > > > For now, I'll just post 0001, which I am claiming has no semantic > > > changes (proof pending), to rule out that that one's responsible. > > > > Nope, not 0001. Here's 0001+0002. > > Please note that you can set up a github repository so that cirrus-ci > tests whatever patches you like, without having to post them to > pg-hackers. See src/tools/ci/README, it takes three minutes if you > already have the account and repository. Ah, that’s right. Will do so, thanks for the suggestion. > -- Thanks, Amit Langote EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
