>> I tried to apply the v2 patch approach to make_etags but noticed that
>> make_ctags and make_etags have quite a few duplicate codes, that would
>> bring maintenance headache. I think we could merge make_etags into
>> make_ctags, then add "-e" option (or whatever) to make_ctags so that
>> it generates tags files for emacs if the option is specified.
> 
> If we're going to do this, then I suggest that make_etags should become
> a symlink to make_ctags, and behave as if -e is given when called under
> that name.

What I had in my mind was making make_etags a script just exec
make_ctags (with -e option). But I don't have strong
preference. Symlink is ok for me too.

>> +tags_file=tags
> 
>> +rm -f ./$tags_file
> 
> I think $tags_file should include the leading ./ bit, to reduce
> confusion.

Ok.

> However ... hmm ... 
> 
>>  find . \( -name 'CVS' -prune \) -o \( -name .git -prune \) -o -type d 
>> -print |
>>  while read DIR
>> -do  [ "$DIR" != "." ] && ln -f -s `echo "$DIR" | sed 's;/[^/]*;/..;g'`/tags 
>> "$DIR"/tags
>> +do  [ "$DIR" != "." ] && ln -f -s `echo "$DIR" | sed 
>> 's;/[^/]*;/..;g'`/$tags_file "$DIR"/$tags_file
>>  done
> 
> ... does this create a tags symlink on each directory?  This seems
> strange to me,

I don't know the original author's intention for this but I think it
makes use of the tag file in emacs a little bit easier.  Emacs
confirms for the first time the default location of tags file under
the same directory where the source file resides. I can just hit
return key if there's a symlink of tags. If we do not create the
symlink, we have to specify the directory where the tags file was
originally created, which is a little bit annoying.

> but I admit the hack I keep in my .vim/vimrc looks even
> more strange:
> 
> :  let $CSCOPE_DB=substitute(getcwd(), "^\\(.*/pgsql/source/ [^/]*\\)/.*", 
> "\\1", "")
> :  let &tags=substitute(getcwd(), "^\\(.*/pgsql/source/[^/]*\\)/.*", "\\1", 
> "") . "/tags"
> 
> Not sure which is worse.  Having dozens of identically named symlinks
> doesn't strike me as a great arrangement though.  I would definitely not
> use make_ctags if this is unavoidable.  I see both scripts do likewise
> currently.

Well, I often visit different tags file for different development
projects (for example Pgpool-II) and I don't want to have fixed
location of tags file in emacs setting. For this reason make_etags's
approach is acceptable for me.

Best reagards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS LLC
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp


Reply via email to