On 2022-Oct-20, Bharath Rupireddy wrote: > I think elsewhere in the code we reset dangling pointers either ways - > before or after deleting/resetting memory context. But placing them > before would give us extra safety in case memory context > deletion/reset fails. Not sure what's the best way. However, I'm > nullifying the dangling pointers after deleting/resetting memory > context.
I agree that's a good idea, and the patch looks good to me, but I don't think asserting that they are null afterwards is useful. -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
