On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 7:27 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Agreed, I think the important point to decide is what to do for > back-branches. We have the next minor release in a few days' time and > this is the last release for v10. I see the following options based on > the discussion here. > > a. Use the code change in 0001 from email [1] and a comment change > proposed by Robert in email [2] to fix the bug reported. This should > be backpatched till v10. Then separately, we can consider committing > something like 0002 from email [1] as a HEAD-only patch. > b. Use the code change in 0001 from email [1] to fix the bug reported. > This should be backpatched till v10. Then separately, we can consider > committing something like 0002 from email [1] as a HEAD-only patch. > c. Combine 0001 and 0002 from the email [1] and push them in all > branches till v10. > > I prefer going with (a).
I vote for (a) or (b) for now, and we can consider what else to do later. It might even include back-patching. But fixing things that are causing problems we can see seems to me to have higher priority than fixing things that are not. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
