On Thu, Nov 03, 2022 at 07:19:07PM +0700, John Naylor wrote: > Because it wouldn't compile otherwise, obviously. :-) > > I must have been working on it before bfb9dfd93720
Hehe, my fault then ;p The CI is able to complete without it. Would you mind if it is removed? If you don't want us to poke more at the bear, that's a nit so leaving things as they are is also fine by me. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
