On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:00:36AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 4/23/18 05:54, Liudmila Mantrova wrote: > > Reading this thread, I got an impression that everyone would benefit > > from converting back branches to XML, but the main concern is lack of > > resources to complete this task. Are there any other issues that affect > > this decision? Looks like Aleksander Lakhin's offer to prepare patches > > was missed somehow as the discussion sidetracked to other issues > > That proposal seemed to indicate not only converting the source code to > XML but also the build system to XSL. The latter is out of the > question, I think.
Why is that? I thought people building current Postgres would already have the XML toolchain built to build older release documentation. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
