Hi,
On 2022-11-21 17:06:16 +0100, Jakub Wartak wrote:
> @@ -6213,14 +6216,26 @@ get_actual_variable_endpoint(Relation heapRel,
> /* Fetch first/next tuple in specified direction */
> while ((tid = index_getnext_tid(index_scan, indexscandir)) != NULL)
> {
> + BlockNumber block = ItemPointerGetBlockNumber(tid);
> if (!VM_ALL_VISIBLE(heapRel,
> -
> ItemPointerGetBlockNumber(tid),
> + block,
> &vmbuffer))
> {
> /* Rats, we have to visit the heap to check visibility
> */
> if (!index_fetch_heap(index_scan, tableslot))
> continue; /* no visible tuple,
> try next index entry */
>
> + {
> + CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
> + if (block != last_block)
> + visited_pages++;
> +#define VISITED_PAGES_LIMIT 100
> + if (visited_pages > VISITED_PAGES_LIMIT)
> + break;
> + else
> + continue; /* no visible tuple, try next
> index entry */
> + }
> +
> /* We don't actually need the heap tuple for anything */
> ExecClearTuple(tableslot);
>
> --
> 2.30.2
This can't quite be right - isn't this only applying the limit if we found a
visible tuple?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
