Hi, On 2022-11-22 12:51:25 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 07:01:18PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > > I plan to push this soon unless somebody has further comments. > > > @@ -146,7 +146,8 @@ typedef enum > > WAIT_EVENT_RECOVERY_RETRIEVE_RETRY_INTERVAL, > > WAIT_EVENT_REGISTER_SYNC_REQUEST, > > WAIT_EVENT_VACUUM_DELAY, > > - WAIT_EVENT_VACUUM_TRUNCATE > > + WAIT_EVENT_VACUUM_TRUNCATE, > > + WAIT_EVENT_SPIN_DELAY > > } WaitEventTimeout; > > That would be fine for stable branches, but could you keep that in an > alphabetical order on HEAD?
Fair point. I wasn't planning to backpatch. Greetings, Andres Freund
