On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 at 18:44, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > I wrote: > > Still wondering if there's really no CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPT anywhere > > else in this loop. > > I did some experimentation using the test case Jakub presented > to start with, and verified that that loop does respond promptly > to control-C even in HEAD. So there are CFI(s) in the loop as > I thought, and we don't need another.
Thanks for checking. Sorry for not responding earlier. > What we do need is some more work on nearby comments. I'll > see about that and push it. Thanks; nicely streamlined. -- Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/