On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 11:26:50AM -0800, Andrey Borodin wrote: > Some funny stuff. If a user tries to cancel a non-replicated transaction > Azure Postgres will answer: "user requested cancel while waiting for > synchronous replication ack. The COMMIT record has already flushed to > WAL locally and might not have been replicatead to the standby. We > must wait here." > AWS RDS will answer: "ignoring request to cancel wait for synchronous > replication" > Yandex Managed Postgres will answer: "canceling wait for synchronous > replication due requested, but cancelation is not allowed. The > transaction has already committed locally and might not have been > replicated to the standby. We must wait here." > > So, for many services providing Postgres as a service it's only a > matter of wording.
Wow, you are telling me all three cloud vendors changed how query cancel behaves on an unresponsive synchronous replica? That is certainly a testament that the community needs to change or at least review our behavior. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Embrace your flaws. They make you human, rather than perfect, which you will never be.
