On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 5:10 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > I spent some more time on the prevent-unnecessary-wakeups patch for > logical/worker.c that I've been alluding to in this thread, and I found a > few more places where we depend on the worker periodically waking up. This > seems to be a common technique, so I'm beginning to wonder whether these > changes are worthwhile. I think there's a good chance it would become a > game of whac-a-mole.
Aren't they all bugs, though, making our tests and maybe even real systems slower than they need to be?
