On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 at 20:46, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > I wrote: > > That seems like a fairly bad idea: it will add extra contention > > on ProcArrayLock, and I see no real strong argument that the path > > can't get traversed often enough for that to matter. It would > > likely be better for KnownAssignedXidsCompress to obtain the lock > > for itself, only after it knows there is something worth doing. > > Since we're running out of time in the current commitfest, > I went ahead and changed that, and made the cosmetic fixes > I wanted, and pushed.
That is a complete patch from multiple angles; very happy here. Thanks for a great job. -- Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
