On Thu, 1 Dec 2022 15:48:21 +0900 Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 05:29:58PM +0900, Yugo NAGATA wrote: > > Thank you for your review. I agree that an isolation test is required. > > The attached patch contains the test using the scenario as explained in > > the previous post. > > Cool, thanks. Sorry for my late reply here. I have put my head on > that for a few hours and could not see why we should not allow that. > So committed the change after a few tweaks to the tests with the use > of custom permutations, mainly. Thank! > While looking at all that, I have looked at the past threads like [1], > just to note that this has never been really mentioned. > > [1]: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1371225929.28496.yahoomail...@web162905.mail.bf1.yahoo.com > -- > Michael -- Yugo NAGATA <nag...@sraoss.co.jp>
