Hi, On December 1, 2022 9:48:48 PM PST, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >> On 2022-12-02 00:08:20 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Just the table-to-view hack. I'm not aware that there are any other >>> cases, and it seems hard to credit that there ever will be any. > >> I can see some halfway credible scenarios. E.g. converting a view to a >> matview, or a table into a partition. I kind of wonder if it's worth keeping >> the change, just in case we do - it's not that easy to hit... > >I'd suggest putting in an assertion that the relkind isn't changing, >instead.
Sounds like a plan. Will you do that when you remove the table-to-view hack? Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
