On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:36 AM Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:
> > On 2022-12-05 Mo 11:20, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:09 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > >>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 10:57 PM Corey Huinker <corey.huin...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>>> 2. ereturn_* => errfeedback / error_feedback / feedback > >>> Oh, I like that, especially errfeedback. > >> efeedback? But TBH I do not think any of these are better than ereturn. > > I do. Having a macro name that is "return" plus one character is going > > to make people think that it returns. I predict that if you insist on > > using that name people are still going to be making mistakes based on > > that confusion 10 years from now. > > > > OK, I take both this point and Tom's about trying to keep it the same > length. So we need something that's 7 letters, doesn't say 'return' and > preferably begins with 'e'. I modestly suggest 'eseterr', or if we like > the 'feedback' idea 'efeedbk'. > > > Consulting https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/feedback again: ereply clocks in at 7 characters.
