On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 1:00 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: > > Wait a minute! Oh, no, sorry, as you were, 'errsave' is fine. > > Seems like everybody's okay with errsave. I'll make a v2 in a > little bit. I'd like to try updating array_in and/or record_in > just to verify that indirection cases work okay, before we consider > the design to be set. >
+1 to errsave.
