On 2022-Dec-06, Brar Piening wrote: > On 06.12.2022 at 01:55, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote: > > > Oh, now you mention it, I vaguely recall seeing those. However the thread > > stalled back in March and the patches don't seem to have made it to a > > CommitFest entry. > > Yes, my patches added quite a few ids and also some xsl/css logic to > make them more discoverable in the browser but I had gotten the > impression that nobody besides me cares about this, so I didn't push it > any further.
I care. The problem last time is that we were in the middle of the last commitfest, so we were (or at least I was) distracted by other stuff. Looking at the resulting psql page, https://pgdocs.piening.info/app-psql.html#APP-PSQL-OPTIONS-EXPANDED I note that the ID for the -x option is called "options-blah". I understand where does this come from: it's the "expanded" bit in the "options" section. However, put together it's a bit silly to have "options" in plural there; it would make more sense to have it be https://pgdocs.piening.info/app-psql.html#APP-PSQL-OPTION-EXPANDED (where you can read more naturally "the expanded option for psql"). How laborious would it be to make it so? > Yes. I can certainly add them to the commitfest although I'm not sure if > they still apply cleanly. It'll probably have some conflicts, yeah. > I can also rebase or extend them if somebody cares. I would welcome separate patches: one to add the IDs, another for the XSL/CSS stuff. That allows us to discuss them separately. -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
