I noticed that the issue of ownership seems to have not been considered. For example, if a user 'a' from the publishing side creates a table t1, the owner of t1 is not user 'a' after it is replicated to the subscribing side. This is a situation that has not been encountered in previous DML replication.
I think the ownership relationship should not be lost, and we should perhaps add it back, like pg_dump "ALTER TABLE public.t1 OWNER TO a;", even though we do not currently support the replication of USER. Thought? li jie.
