On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 1:18 PM Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote: > So I don't see any evidence we skip any locking on pg_class when doing > updates on rows for temporary tables.
I don't know what this means. You don't have to lock pg_class to update rows in any table, whether temporary or otherwise. You do have to lock a table in order to update its pg_class row, though, whether the table is temporary or not. Otherwise, another session could drop it while you're doing something with it, after which bad things would happen. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
