On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 2:20 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 8:17 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Summary > > ------- > > > > In summary, everything I have tested so far appeared to be working > > properly. In other words, for overlapping streamed transactions of > > different kinds, and regardless of whether zero/some/all of those > > transactions are getting processed by a PA worker, the resulting > > replicated data looked consistently OK. > > > > Thanks for doing the detailed testing of this patch. I think the one > area where we can focus more is the switch-to-serialization mode while > sending changes to the parallel worker. > > > > > NOTE - all testing described in this post above was using v58-0001 > > only. However, the point of implementing these as a .spec test was to > > be able to repeat these same regression tests on newer versions with > > minimal manual steps required. Later I plan to fetch/apply the most > > recent patch version and repeat these same tests. > > > > That would be really helpful. >
FYI, my pub-sub.spec tests gave the same result (i.e. pass) when re-run against the latest v62-0001 (parallel apply base patch) and v62-0004 (GUC 'force_stream_mode' patch). ------ Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia