On 1/3/23 19:14, Tom Lane wrote:
Corey Huinker <corey.huin...@gmail.com> writes:
On Mon, Jan 2, 2023 at 10:57 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
While I approve of trying to get some functionality in this area,
I'm not sure that extending CAST is a great idea, because I'm afraid
that the SQL committee will do something that conflicts with it.

I'm going off the spec that Vik presented in
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/f8600a3b-f697-2577-8fea-f40d3e18b...@postgresfriends.org
which is his effort to get it through the SQL committee.

I'm pretty certain that sending something to pgsql-hackers will have
exactly zero impact on the SQL committee.  Is there anything actually
submitted to the committee, and if so what's its status?

I have not posted my paper to the committee yet, but I plan to do so before the working group's meeting early February. Just like with posting patches here, I cannot guarantee that it will get accepted but I will be arguing for it.

I don't think we should add that syntax until I do get it through the committee, just in case they change something.
--
Vik Fearing



Reply via email to