On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 4:55 PM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 9:14 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> > wrote: > > The contents looks good to me other than that problem, and I agree to > > backpatch it. > > Cool. Thanks for the review. > > > Why did you choose to use two dots for ellipses in some command > > <literal>s rather than three? I know I've made that choice too on > > occassion, but there aren't many such cases and maybe we should put a > > stop to it (or a period) before it spreads too much. > > Honestly, I wasn't aware that we had some other convention for it.
Committed and back-patched 0001 with fixes for the issues that you pointed out. Here's a trivial rebase of the rest of the patch set. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
v3-0001-Refactor-permissions-checking-for-role-grants.patch
Description: Binary data
v3-0004-Add-new-GUC-createrole_self_grant.patch
Description: Binary data
v3-0002-Pass-down-current-user-ID-to-AddRoleMems-and-DelR.patch
Description: Binary data
v3-0003-Restrict-the-privileges-of-CREATEROLE-users.patch
Description: Binary data
