Thanks for the reply. > Thanks for reporting. I think for LogicalParallelApplyStateChange we'd better > document it in a consistent style with LogicalSyncStateChange, > so I have slightly adjusted the patch for the same.
I think the description in the patch you attached is better. Regards, Noriyoshi Shinoda -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, January 9, 2023 7:15 PM To: Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP) <[email protected]>; Amit Kapila <[email protected]> Cc: Masahiko Sawada <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Peter Smith <[email protected]>; [email protected]; PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>; Dilip Kumar <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply On Monday, January 9, 2023 5:32 PM Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, Thanks for the great new feature. > > Applied patches include adding wait events LogicalParallelApplyMain, > LogicalParallelApplyStateChange. > However, it seems that monitoring.sgml only contains descriptions for > pg_locks. The attached patch adds relevant wait event information. > Please update if you have a better description. Thanks for reporting. I think for LogicalParallelApplyStateChange we'd better document it in a consistent style with LogicalSyncStateChange, so I have slightly adjusted the patch for the same. Best regards, Hou zj
