st 11. 1. 2023 v 18:25 odesÃlatel Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> napsal:
> > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 6:19 PM Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> st 11. 1. 2023 v 17:50 odesÃlatel Isaac Morland <isaac.morl...@gmail.com> >> napsal: >> >>> I find \df+ much less useful than it should be because it tends to be >>> cluttered up with source code. Now that we have \sf, would it be reasonable >>> to remove the source code from the \df+ display? This would make it easier >>> to see function permissions and comments. If somebody wants to see the full >>> definition of a function they can always invoke \sf on it. >>> >>> If there is consensus on the idea in principle I will write up a patch. >>> >> >> +1 >> >> > +1 but maybe with a twist. For any functions in a procedural language like > plpgsql, it makes it pretty useless today. But when viewing an internal or > C language function, it's short enough and still actually useful. Maybe > some combination where it would keep showing those for such language, but > would show "use \sf to view source" for procedural languages? > yes, it is almost necessary for C functions or functions in external languages. Maybe it can be specified in pg_language if prosrc is really source code or some reference. > -- > Magnus Hagander > Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/> > Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/> >
