Hi,
On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 2:19 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 6:37 AM Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu)
> <osumi.takami...@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Can you please explain a bit more as asked above to understand the
> > > difference?
> > So, the current difference is that the time-delayed apply worker of
> > logical replication doesn't apply the delayed transaction on the
> > subscriber when the subscription has been disabled during the delay,
> > while (in one example of a promotion) the physical replication does the
> > apply
> of the delayed transaction.
> >
>
> I don't see any particular reason here to allow the transaction apply to
> complete
> if the subscription is disabled. Note, that here we are waiting at the
> beginning
> of the transaction and for large transactions, it might cause a significant
> delay if
> we allow applying the xact. OTOH, if someone comes up with a valid use case
> to allow the transaction apply to get completed after the subscription is
> disabled then we can anyway do it later as well.
This makes sense. I agree with you. So, I'll keep the current behavior of
the patch.
Best Regards,
Takamichi Osumi
