On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 07:28:42PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >> I think I've proposed this before, but I still think that as long as we rely >> on pg_bsd_indent, we should have it be part of our source tree and >> automatically built. It's no wonder that barely anybody indents their >> patches, given that it requires building pg_bsd_ident in a separate repo (but >> referencing our sourc etree), putting the binary in path, etc. > > Hmm ... right offhand, the only objection I can see is that the > pg_bsd_indent files use the BSD 4-clause license, which is not ours. > However, didn't UCB grant a blanket exception years ago that said > that people could treat that as the 3-clause license? If we could > get past the license question, I agree that doing what you suggest > would be superior to the current situation.
+1. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
