Hi, On 2023-01-23 19:21:00 -0600, Justin Pryzby wrote: > Michael seemed to support this idea and nobody verbalized hatred of it, > so I implemented it. In v15, we have shared_memory_size_in_huge_pages, > so this adds effective_huge_pages. > > Feel free to suggest a better name.
Hm. Should this be a GUC? There's a reason shared_memory_size_in_huge_pages is one - it's so it's accessible via -C. But here we could make it a function or whatnot as well. I'm ok with this being a GUC, it doesn't feel elegant, but I suspect there's no realistic elegant answer. Greetings, Andres Freund
