Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 01:54:08PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> - * Both inputs must be ordinary finite timestamps (in current usage,
>> - * they'll be results from GetCurrentTimestamp()).
>> + * At least one input must be an ordinary finite timestamp, else the "diff"
>> + * calculation might overflow. We do support stop_time ==
>> TIMESTAMP_INFINITY,
>> + * which will result in INT_MAX wait time.
> I wonder if we should explicitly reject negative timestamps to eliminate
> any chance of int64 overflow, too.
Hmm. I'm disinclined to add an assumption that the epoch is in the past,
but I take your point that the subtraction would overflow with
TIMESTAMP_INFINITY and a negative finite timestamp. Maybe we should
make use of pg_sub_s64_overflow()?
BTW, I just noticed that the adjacent function TimestampDifference
has a lot of callers that would be much happier using
TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds.
regards, tom lane
