Andrey Borodin <amborodi...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:12 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> That test case is demonstrating fundamental
>> database corruption after a crash.
> Not exactly corruption. XID was not persisted and buffer data did not
> hit a disk. Database is in the correct state.
Really? I don't see how this part is even a little bit okay:
[00:40:50.744](0.046s) not ok 3 - xid is aborted after crash
[00:40:50.745](0.001s)
[00:40:50.745](0.000s) # Failed test 'xid is aborted after crash'
# at t/011_crash_recovery.pl line 57.
[00:40:50.746](0.001s) # got: 'committed'
# expected: 'aborted'
If any tuples made by that transaction had reached disk,
we'd have a problem.
regards, tom lane
