On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 6:37 PM Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > > I don't see what your reference to checkpoint timeout is about here? > > > > Also, as I mentioned before, the problem isn't specific to > > checkpoint_timeout > > = 1min. It just makes it cheaper to reproduce. > > That's flagrantly intellectually dishonest.
This kind of ad hominum attack has no place on this mailing list, or anywhere in the PostgreSQL community. If you think there's a problem with Andres's test case, or his analysis of it, you can talk about those problems without accusing him of intellectual dishonesty. I don't see anything to indicate that he was being intentionally dishonest, either. At most he was mistaken. More than likely, not even that. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
