On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 10:52 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > IMHO superuser should typically only be mentioned when it is the only way > to do something. Since superusers have all privileges, I think logs like > "superuser or privileges of X" are kind of redundant. If Robert has > privileges of X, we wouldn't say "privileges of X or Robert." We'd just > point to X. Ultimately, I feel like mentioning superuser in error messages > usually just makes the message longer without adding any useful > information.
That's kind of my opinion too, but I'm not sure whether there are cases where it will lead to confusion. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
