Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostg...@gmail.com> writes: >> Both of you are arguing as though GUC_NO_SHOW_ALL is a security >> property. It is not, or at least it's so trivially bypassable >> that it's useless to consider it one. All it is is a de-clutter >> mechanism.
> Understood. If that is the case, then I am ok with the patch.
Pushed v4, then.
regards, tom lane
