On 1/27/23 22:19, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On 2023-01-27 12:06:49 +0100, Jakub Wartak wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 4:49 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> >>> Huh? Why did you remove the GUC? >> >> After reading previous threads, my optimism level of getting it ever >> in shape of being widely accepted degraded significantly (mainly due >> to the discussion of wider category of 'WAL I/O throttling' especially >> in async case, RPO targets in async case and potentially calculating >> global bandwidth). > > I think it's quite reasonable to limit this to a smaller scope. Particularly > because those other goals are pretty vague but ambitious goals. IMO the > problem with a lot of the threads is precisely that that they aimed at a level > of generallity that isn't achievable in one step. >
+1 to that -- Tomas Vondra EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
