Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> writes:
> Reading Andres's comments and realising how relatively young
> txid_status() is compared to txid_current(), I'm now wondering if we
> shouldn't just disclaim the whole thing in back branches.
My thoughts were trending in that direction too. It's starting
to sound like we aren't going to be able to make a fix that
we'd be willing to risk back-patching, even if it were completely
compatible at the user level.
Still, the idea that txid_status() isn't trustworthy is rather
scary. I wonder whether there is a failure mode here that's
exhibitable without using that.
regards, tom lane
