On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 15:05, Joel Jacobson <j...@compiler.org> wrote:
>
> I also think the performance impact no matter how small isn't worth it,
> but a comment based on your comments would be very valuable IMO.
>
> Below is an attempt at summarising your text, and to avoid the performance
> impact,
> maybe an #if so we get the general correct formula for DEC_DIGITS 1 or 2,
> and the reduced hand-optimised form for DEC_DIGITS 4?
> That could also improve readabilty, since readers perhaps more easily would
> see
> the relation between sweight and arg.weight, for the only DEC_DIGITS case we
> care about.
>
That seems a bit wordy, given the context of this comment. I think
it's sufficient to just give the formula, and note that it simplifies
when DEC_DIGITS is even (not just 4):
/*
* Assume the input was normalized, so arg.weight is accurate. The result
* then has at least sweight = floor(arg.weight * DEC_DIGITS / 2 + 1)
* digits before the decimal point. When DEC_DIGITS is even, we can save
* a few cycles, since the division is exact and there is no need to
* round down.
*/
#if DEC_DIGITS == ((DEC_DIGITS / 2) * 2)
sweight = arg.weight * DEC_DIGITS / 2 + 1;
#else
if (arg.weight >= 0)
sweight = arg.weight * DEC_DIGITS / 2 + 1;
else
sweight = 1 - (1 - arg.weight * DEC_DIGITS) / 2;
#endif
Regards,
Dean
