Michael Paquier <[email protected]> writes: > Could it be worth back-patching f3e7806?
That's aged long enough now that it seems like a pretty safe
thing to do.
regards, tom lane
Michael Paquier <[email protected]> writes: > Could it be worth back-patching f3e7806?
That's aged long enough now that it seems like a pretty safe
thing to do.
regards, tom lane