On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 6:41 PM David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't really share Laurenz's worry [2] about compatibility break > from renaming this GUC. I think the legitimate usages of this setting > are probably far more rare than the illegitimate ones. I'm not overly > concerned about renaming if it helps stop people from making this > mistake. I believe the current name is just too conveniently named and > that users are likely just to incorrectly assume it does exactly what > they want because what else could it possibly do?! > > I think something like debug_parallel_query is much less likely to be misused.
+1 on both points. -- John Naylor EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
