Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2023-02-03 02:24:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> setsid(2) is required since SUSv2, so I'm not sure which systems >> are of concern here ... other than Redmond's of course.
> I was thinking of windows, yes.
But given the lack of fork(2), Windows requires a completely
different solution anyway, no?
regards, tom lane
