Amit Langote wrote: > On 2018/05/09 11:31, David Rowley wrote: > > On 9 May 2018 at 14:29, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > >> On 2018/05/09 11:20, Michael Paquier wrote: > >>> While looking at this code, is there any reason to not make > >>> gen_partprune_steps static? This is only used in partprune.c for now, > >>> so the intention is to make it available for future patches?
> Here is a patch that does that. Pushed, thanks. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
