Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 01:28:26PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think Peter's misremembering the history, and OpenSSL 3 *is*
>> supported in these branches. There could be an argument for
>> not back-patching f0d2c65f17 on the grounds that pre-1.1.1 is
>> also supported there. On the whole though, it seems more useful
>> today for that test to pass with 3.x than for it to pass with 0.9.8.
>> And I can't see investing effort to make it do both (but if Peter
>> wants to, I won't stand in the way).
> Cutting support for 0.9.8 in oldest branches would be a very risky
> move, but as you say, if that only involves a failure in the SSL
> tests while still allowing anything we have to work, fine by me to
> live with that.
Question: is anybody around here still testing with 0.9.8 (or 1.0.x)
at all? The systems I had that had that version on them are dead.
regards, tom lane
