On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 04:21:57PM +0530, Nitin Jadhav wrote: > Makes sense and the patch looks good to me.
Ah, OK. Thanks for the feedback! I am wondering.. Did people notice that this adds GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE to config_file in guc_tables.c? This makes sense in the long run based on what this parameter is by design, still there may be an objection to doing that? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
