On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 04:40:08PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > v2 looks good to me as far as it goes.
Thanks. I have applied that after an extra lookup. > I agree these other questions deserve a separate look. Okay, I may be able to come back to that. Another point is that we need to do a better job in forcing the execution of the query jumbling in one of the TAP tests running pg_regress, outside pg_stat_statements, to maximize coverage. Will see to that on a separate thread. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature